skip to main | skip to sidebar
California Punitive Damages
News and commentary on punitive damages litigation in California and nationwide.
This blog is maintained by attorneys at Horvitz & Levy LLP, the nation's largest law firm devoted exclusively to appellate litigation.
  • Disclaimer

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe via email
Follow us on Twitter

Statutes

  • California Civil Code, sections 3294-3296

Archive

Labels

  • Arbitration (6)
  • California Court of Appeal (301)
  • California Supreme Court (75)
  • Celebrities (19)
  • Choice of Law (5)
  • Class Actions (28)
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence (25)
  • Default Judgments (11)
  • Extraterritoriality (8)
  • Exxon Valdez (61)
  • Financial Condition Evidence (84)
  • Foreign Courts (29)
  • Gulf Oil Spill (4)
  • Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
  • Jury Instructions (19)
  • Labor and Employment (16)
  • Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
  • Law Review Articles (67)
  • Legislation (78)
  • Managing Agents (23)
  • Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
  • Pleading (6)
  • Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
  • Statistics (8)
  • Statutory Penalties (3)
  • Taxation (23)
  • Top 10 Lists (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (49)
  • U.S. Supreme Court (154)

Recommended Blogs

  • The Volokh Conspiracy
    [John Ross] Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
    1 hour ago
  • At the Lectern
    Juvenile restraining order opinion filing Monday
    1 hour ago
  • Election Law Blog
    “Why Local Election Officials In Georgia Take Issue With Many Parts Of New Law”
    2 hours ago
  • How Appealing
    “Can Democrats really pack the Supreme Court?”
    3 hours ago
  • SCOTUSblog
    Harvard FedSoc chapter to host debate on court packing
    3 hours ago
  • Southern California Appellate News
    Kagan rules!
    4 hours ago
  • The Legal Pulse
    Anticipating Plaintiff Strategies After High Court TCPA Ruling
    6 hours ago
  • TortsProf Blog
    Justifying Private Rights
    8 hours ago
  • Lowering the Bar
    A Farewell to Madoff
    1 day ago
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES
    Appealability, Experts, Section 998: 2/8 DCA Declines To Consider Plaintiff’s Arguments Against Trial Court’s PostJudgment Award To Prevailing Defendants Of Section 998 Expert Witness Fees
    3 days ago
  • Guideposts | Punitive Damages Blog | Law Lawyers | Mayer Brown LLP
    Evan Tager Discusses Whether A Case Involving Baby Powder Might Yield The Next Blockbuster Supreme Court Punitive Damages Decision
    4 weeks ago
  • Cal Biz Lit
    THE 2020 CONSENT JUDGMENT SETTLEMENTS
    1 month ago
  • The Complex Litigator Home
    Episode 31 of The Class Re-Action Podcast is now available
    1 month ago
  • The UCL Practitioner
    Interesting panels during this year's virtual Golden State Institute, October 27-29, 2020
    6 months ago
  • An Appeal to Reason
    What Ruth Bader Ginsburg means to me
    6 months ago
  • Overlawyered
    A good run: Overlawyered, 1999-2020
    10 months ago

Newstex script


































April 26, 2019

Philadelphia jury awards $100M in punitive damages against Johnson and Johnson in pelvic mesh case

The punitive damages awards keep piling up for Johnson and Johnson.  The latest, as reported by the Legal Intelligencer, is a verdict awarding $100 million in punitive damages, on top of $20 million in compensatory damages, to a woman who claimed she was injured by the company's defective pelvic mesh.

Related posts:

Philadelphia jury awards $25 million in punitive damages against Johnson & Johnson


Johnson & Johnson hit for $80 million in punitive damages in New Jersey talc case

Johnson & Johnson hit for $25 million in punitive damages in Indiana

Los Angeles trial court tosses $417 million talc verdict

Missouri appellate court reverses $62 million punitive damages award in talc case, finding no jurisdiction (Fox v. Johnson & Johnson)

L.A. jury awards $347 million in punitive damages against Johnson & Johnson in talc case

Johnson & Johnson gets hit again for punitive damages in Missouri talc litigation

Johnson & Johnson hit for $65 million in punitive damages in third big talc verdict

Johnson & Johnson hit with another big punitive damages award in Missouri over talc-based powder products

Johnson & Johnson vows to appeal $1 billion punitive damages award in hip implant case


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Posted by Curt Cutting at 4:26 PM

Newer Post Older Post Home








GoDaddy Certification