The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that a Missouri trial judge has "affirmed" the $4.69 billion talc verdict against Johnson & Johnson. It seems like a bit of a non-story. Johnson & Johnson elected not to file post-trial motions, so the trial judge did not really affirm anything, he just entered judgment based on the jury's verdict. J&J says it plans to appeal.
Archive
Labels
- Arbitration (6)
- California Court of Appeal (296)
- California Supreme Court (75)
- Celebrities (19)
- Choice of Law (5)
- Class Actions (28)
- Clear and Convincing Evidence (25)
- Default Judgments (11)
- Extraterritoriality (8)
- Exxon Valdez (61)
- Financial Condition Evidence (84)
- Foreign Courts (29)
- Gulf Oil Spill (4)
- Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
- Jury Instructions (19)
- Labor and Employment (16)
- Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
- Law Review Articles (67)
- Legislation (78)
- Managing Agents (21)
- Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
- Pleading (6)
- Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
- Statistics (8)
- Statutory Penalties (3)
- Taxation (23)
- Top 10 Lists (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (48)
- U.S. Supreme Court (153)
Recommended Blogs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
What Ruth Bader Ginsburg means to me3 months ago
-
-
A good run: Overlawyered, 1999-20207 months ago
Newstex script
GoDaddy Certification