skip to main | skip to sidebar
California Punitive Damages
News and commentary on punitive damages litigation in California and nationwide.
This blog is maintained by attorneys at Horvitz & Levy LLP, the nation's largest law firm devoted exclusively to appellate litigation.
  • Disclaimer

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe via email
Follow us on Twitter

Statutes

  • California Civil Code, sections 3294-3296

Archive

Labels

  • Arbitration (6)
  • California Court of Appeal (301)
  • California Supreme Court (75)
  • Celebrities (19)
  • Choice of Law (5)
  • Class Actions (28)
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence (25)
  • Default Judgments (11)
  • Extraterritoriality (8)
  • Exxon Valdez (61)
  • Financial Condition Evidence (84)
  • Foreign Courts (29)
  • Gulf Oil Spill (4)
  • Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
  • Jury Instructions (19)
  • Labor and Employment (16)
  • Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
  • Law Review Articles (67)
  • Legislation (78)
  • Managing Agents (23)
  • Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
  • Pleading (6)
  • Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
  • Statistics (8)
  • Statutory Penalties (3)
  • Taxation (23)
  • Top 10 Lists (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (49)
  • U.S. Supreme Court (154)

Recommended Blogs

  • The Volokh Conspiracy
    [Ilya Somin] Lessons of the Legal and Political Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage
    55 minutes ago
  • How Appealing
    “At Harvard Law, Breyer’s Farewell Address?”
    4 hours ago
  • At the Lectern
    Are two unpublished Supreme Court decisions on recall elections precedential?
    8 hours ago
  • Election Law Blog
    Honored to be Appointed to the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States
    1 day ago
  • SCOTUSblog
    Divided court blocks California’s COVID-related restrictions on in-home religious gatherings
    1 day ago
  • Southern California Appellate News
    Cal SG & SCOTUS clerk news
    1 day ago
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES
    Reasonableness Of Fees, Sanctions: 50% Fee Recovery Award To Prevailing Party Was No Abuse Of Discretion
    2 days ago
  • The Legal Pulse
    In Dissent, Justice Thomas Brings Attention to the Court’s Muddled Regulatory Takings Doctrine
    2 days ago
  • TortsProf Blog
    Robinette & Costa on Section 230
    2 days ago
  • Lowering the Bar
    Man Charged With Driving Stolen Car Appears for Zoom Hearing From Inside Another Stolen Car
    2 days ago
  • Guideposts | Punitive Damages Blog | Law Lawyers | Mayer Brown LLP
    Evan Tager Discusses Whether A Case Involving Baby Powder Might Yield The Next Blockbuster Supreme Court Punitive Damages Decision
    3 weeks ago
  • Cal Biz Lit
    THE 2020 CONSENT JUDGMENT SETTLEMENTS
    5 weeks ago
  • The Complex Litigator Home
    Episode 31 of The Class Re-Action Podcast is now available
    5 weeks ago
  • The UCL Practitioner
    Interesting panels during this year's virtual Golden State Institute, October 27-29, 2020
    5 months ago
  • An Appeal to Reason
    What Ruth Bader Ginsburg means to me
    6 months ago
  • Overlawyered
    A good run: Overlawyered, 1999-2020
    10 months ago

Newstex script


































August 28, 2017

"The Talcum Tort-Stick Up"

The Wall Street Journal ran this opinion piece last Friday, attacking the talc litigation that generated the huge punitive damages verdict in LA last week.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Posted by Curt Cutting at 12:38 PM

Newer Post Older Post Home








GoDaddy Certification