skip to main | skip to sidebar
California Punitive Damages
News and commentary on punitive damages litigation in California and nationwide.
This blog is maintained by attorneys at Horvitz & Levy LLP, the nation's largest law firm devoted exclusively to appellate litigation.
  • Disclaimer

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe via email
Follow us on Twitter

Statutes

  • California Civil Code, sections 3294-3296

Archive

Labels

  • Arbitration (6)
  • California Court of Appeal (296)
  • California Supreme Court (75)
  • Celebrities (19)
  • Choice of Law (5)
  • Class Actions (28)
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence (25)
  • Default Judgments (11)
  • Extraterritoriality (8)
  • Exxon Valdez (61)
  • Financial Condition Evidence (84)
  • Foreign Courts (29)
  • Gulf Oil Spill (4)
  • Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
  • Jury Instructions (19)
  • Labor and Employment (16)
  • Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
  • Law Review Articles (67)
  • Legislation (78)
  • Managing Agents (21)
  • Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
  • Pleading (6)
  • Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
  • Statistics (8)
  • Statutory Penalties (3)
  • Taxation (23)
  • Top 10 Lists (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (48)
  • U.S. Supreme Court (153)

Recommended Blogs

  • The Legal Pulse
    Ninth Circuit Protects Federal Regulatory Regime that Promotes the Dissemination of Nutrition Information
    46 minutes ago
  • Lowering the Bar
    Oklahoma Legislator Proposes Big Foot Hunting Season
    1 hour ago
  • SCOTUSblog
    Friday round-up
    2 hours ago
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
    [Josh Blackman] Today in Supreme Court History: January 22, 1890
    3 hours ago
  • Southern California Appellate News
    It's gotta be over $5K...
    11 hours ago
  • How Appealing
    “Biden Learns to Love Brett Kavanaugh; Democrats suddenly adopt the theory of the unitary executive”
    13 hours ago
  • At the Lectern
    Review granted in mistake-of-fact instructional error case; one vote short for hearing attorney-client privilege issue in gender-identity discrimination matter
    14 hours ago
  • Election Law Blog
    “Referring Former President Trump’s Suspension From Facebook to the Oversight Board”
    21 hours ago
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES
    Discovery, Sanctions: $6,954.95 Deposition Discovery Sanctions Award Was Appealable Even Though It Was Payable To Two Different Recipients, While $1,750 Sanctions Award Was Not Appealable
    22 hours ago
  • TortsProf Blog
    Two by Parks & Grindell on Hazing
    1 day ago
  • Cal Biz Lit
    OEHHA PROPOSES TO DRAMATICALLY CHANGE THE RULES FOR PROPOSITION 65 SHORT FORM WARNINGS
    2 days ago
  • The Complex Litigator Home
    The answer is "yes," Dynamex does apply retroactively on the interpretation of "suffer or permit to work"
    1 week ago
  • Guideposts | Punitive Damages Blog | Law Lawyers | Mayer Brown LLP
    A Tribute To Andy Frey Upon His Retirement From Mayer Brown
    2 weeks ago
  • The UCL Practitioner
    Interesting panels during this year's virtual Golden State Institute, October 27-29, 2020
    3 months ago
  • An Appeal to Reason
    What Ruth Bader Ginsburg means to me
    4 months ago
  • Overlawyered
    A good run: Overlawyered, 1999-2020
    7 months ago

Newstex script


































November 19, 2015

"Man Gets $21.5M Verdict for Door Injury, But IRS is Biggest Winner"

Robert W. Wood wrote this piece for Forbes, using the recent verdict against Holland America to illustrate the tax consequences of punitive damages awards.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Posted by Curt Cutting at 11:33 AM

Labels: Taxation

Newer Post Older Post Home








GoDaddy Certification