skip to main | skip to sidebar
California Punitive Damages
News and commentary on punitive damages litigation in California and nationwide.
This blog is maintained by attorneys at Horvitz & Levy LLP, the nation's largest law firm devoted exclusively to appellate litigation.
  • Disclaimer

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe via email
Follow us on Twitter

Statutes

  • California Civil Code, sections 3294-3296

Archive

Labels

  • Arbitration (6)
  • California Court of Appeal (276)
  • California Supreme Court (68)
  • Celebrities (19)
  • Choice of Law (5)
  • Class Actions (28)
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence (23)
  • Default Judgments (11)
  • Extraterritoriality (8)
  • Exxon Valdez (61)
  • Financial Condition Evidence (80)
  • Foreign Courts (29)
  • Gulf Oil Spill (4)
  • Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
  • Jury Instructions (19)
  • Labor and Employment (16)
  • Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
  • Law Review Articles (67)
  • Legislation (76)
  • Managing Agents (21)
  • Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
  • Pleading (6)
  • Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
  • Statistics (8)
  • Statutory Penalties (3)
  • Taxation (23)
  • Top 10 Lists (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (45)
  • U.S. Supreme Court (151)

Recommended Blogs

  • The Volokh Conspiracy
    [Eugene Volokh] "Let Us Restore to Social Intercourse …
    4 hours ago
  • SCOTUSblog
    This week at the court
    7 hours ago
  • Overlawyered
    Great moments in public employee tenure
    7 hours ago
  • How Appealing
    “Another Kavanaugh confirmation book on the way, this one claiming Republicans plotted ‘takeover’ of Supreme Court”
    9 hours ago
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES
    POOF!, SLAPP: Fee Award Of $56,225 Goes POOF! On Appeal When Sixth District Reverses SLAPP Grant
    1 day ago
  • Election Law Blog
    Trump at Louisiana Rally Says Democrats are Pursuing “illegal, invalid and unconstitutional bullshit impeachment.”
    1 day ago
  • At the Lectern
    Judges Association to honor former CJ Bird and former Justices Grodin and Reynoso
    2 days ago
  • Southern California Appellate News
    CJA Award to former CSC Justices
    2 days ago
  • The Legal Pulse
    WLF Urges Fifth Circuit to Overturn FTC Decision that Prevents Settlement of Drug-Patent Lawsuits
    3 days ago
  • Lowering the Bar
    Court Is Now In Session, The Honorable Captain Kangaroo Presiding
    4 days ago
  • The Complex Litigator Home
    A quick note on Gonzalez v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc.
    5 days ago
  • TortsProf Blog
    NC: $750,000 Alienation of Affection Verdict
    6 days ago
  • An Appeal to Reason
    Time to Speak Out
    2 months ago
  • Guideposts | Punitive Damages Blog | Law Lawyers | Mayer Brown LLP
    Mayer Brown Submits Amicus Brief For Chamber Of Commerce In Seventh Circuit Appeal Involving Proper Application Of Punitive Damages Guideposts
    2 months ago
  • The UCL Practitioner
    Interplay between UCL and tax code: McClain v. Sav-On Drugs and Loeffler v. Target Corp.
    5 months ago
  • Cal Biz Lit
    AND NOW, HERE’S CBL’S REPORT ON 2018 CONSENT JUDGMENT SETTLEMENTS
    7 months ago

Newstex script


































May 13, 2009

"Souter favored limits on punitive damages"

Fortune.com has an article online today entitled "What will Souter's retirement mean for business? Justice favored limits on punitive damages."

I posted a few thoughts on this topic earlier this month, in response to a post on the Volokh Conspiracy.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Posted by Curt Cutting at 11:49 AM

Labels: U.S. Supreme Court

Newer Post Older Post Home








GoDaddy Certification