skip to main | skip to sidebar
California Punitive Damages
News and commentary on punitive damages litigation in California and nationwide.
This blog is maintained by attorneys at Horvitz & Levy LLP, the nation's largest law firm devoted exclusively to appellate litigation.
  • Disclaimer

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe via email
Follow us on Twitter

Statutes

  • California Civil Code, sections 3294-3296

Archive

Labels

  • Arbitration (6)
  • California Court of Appeal (299)
  • California Supreme Court (75)
  • Celebrities (19)
  • Choice of Law (5)
  • Class Actions (28)
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence (25)
  • Default Judgments (11)
  • Extraterritoriality (8)
  • Exxon Valdez (61)
  • Financial Condition Evidence (84)
  • Foreign Courts (29)
  • Gulf Oil Spill (4)
  • Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
  • Jury Instructions (19)
  • Labor and Employment (16)
  • Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
  • Law Review Articles (67)
  • Legislation (78)
  • Managing Agents (23)
  • Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
  • Pleading (6)
  • Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
  • Statistics (8)
  • Statutory Penalties (3)
  • Taxation (23)
  • Top 10 Lists (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (48)
  • U.S. Supreme Court (153)

Recommended Blogs

  • Southern California Appellate News
    Justice Breyer presiding
    1 hour ago
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
    [Josh Blackman] Classes #12: "Offensive" Speech II & Estates IV
    2 hours ago
  • How Appealing
    “J&J Appeals $2.1 Billion Talc Judgment to Supreme Court”
    3 hours ago
  • Election Law Blog
    “Supreme Court Case Could Limit Options to Fight Republican Voting Restrictions”
    5 hours ago
  • SCOTUSblog
    Justices appear conflicted about status of administrative patent judges
    10 hours ago
  • TortsProf Blog
    New at the American Museum of Tort Law
    13 hours ago
  • At the Lectern
    Supreme Court documents coming to a computer near you
    1 day ago
  • Cal Biz Lit
    THE 2020 CONSENT JUDGMENT SETTLEMENTS
    2 days ago
  • The Legal Pulse
    DOL Gets 1,500 Comments On Contractor Rule Delay Proposal
    2 days ago
  • Lowering the Bar
    Court: Doctor, Please Don’t Operate on Patients During This Zoom Trial
    2 days ago
  • The Complex Litigator Home
    Episode 31 of The Class Re-Action Podcast is now available
    2 days ago
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES
    Cases Under Review, Private Attorney General: Doe v. Regents Opinion Depublished
    4 days ago
  • Guideposts | Punitive Damages Blog | Law Lawyers | Mayer Brown LLP
    A Tribute To Andy Frey Upon His Retirement From Mayer Brown
    1 month ago
  • The UCL Practitioner
    Interesting panels during this year's virtual Golden State Institute, October 27-29, 2020
    4 months ago
  • An Appeal to Reason
    What Ruth Bader Ginsburg means to me
    5 months ago
  • Overlawyered
    A good run: Overlawyered, 1999-2020
    9 months ago

Newstex script


































May 13, 2009

"Souter favored limits on punitive damages"

Fortune.com has an article online today entitled "What will Souter's retirement mean for business? Justice favored limits on punitive damages."

I posted a few thoughts on this topic earlier this month, in response to a post on the Volokh Conspiracy.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Posted by Curt Cutting at 11:49 AM

Labels: U.S. Supreme Court

Newer Post Older Post Home








GoDaddy Certification