skip to main | skip to sidebar
California Punitive Damages
News and commentary on punitive damages litigation in California and nationwide.
This blog is maintained by attorneys at Horvitz & Levy LLP, the nation's largest law firm devoted exclusively to appellate litigation.
  • Disclaimer

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe via email
Follow us on Twitter

Statutes

  • California Civil Code, sections 3294-3296

Archive

Labels

  • Arbitration (6)
  • California Court of Appeal (278)
  • California Supreme Court (68)
  • Celebrities (19)
  • Choice of Law (5)
  • Class Actions (28)
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence (23)
  • Default Judgments (11)
  • Extraterritoriality (8)
  • Exxon Valdez (61)
  • Financial Condition Evidence (81)
  • Foreign Courts (29)
  • Gulf Oil Spill (4)
  • Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
  • Jury Instructions (19)
  • Labor and Employment (16)
  • Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
  • Law Review Articles (67)
  • Legislation (76)
  • Managing Agents (21)
  • Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
  • Pleading (6)
  • Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
  • Statistics (8)
  • Statutory Penalties (3)
  • Taxation (23)
  • Top 10 Lists (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (45)
  • U.S. Supreme Court (151)

Recommended Blogs

  • How Appealing
    “An Introduction to #AppellateTwitter — It’s Worth a Look”
    1 hour ago
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
    [Stewart Baker] Debating FISA 215 after Pensacola
    1 hour ago
  • SCOTUSblog
    Justices turn down opioid lawsuit, challenge to ultrasound law
    2 hours ago
  • Election Law Blog
    “Comparative Election Administration: A Legal Perspective on Electoral Institutions”
    3 hours ago
  • At the Lectern
    Historical Society review is available
    3 hours ago
  • Lowering the Bar
    “Perhaps Some of the Language ‘Crossed the Line’ of Civility”
    4 hours ago
  • Overlawyered
    Religion and the law roundup
    13 hours ago
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES
    Class Action, Substantiation Of Reasonableness Of Fees: District Judge Adequately Explained 25% Reduction In Lowered Lodestar Hours, Says The Ninth Circuit
    2 days ago
  • Southern California Appellate News
    Kozinski returns to the 9th Circuit
    4 days ago
  • The Legal Pulse
    Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Teleforum: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian
    4 days ago
  • TortsProf Blog
    NJ: Sisters Abused by Priest File Suit Against Archdioceses
    6 days ago
  • The Complex Litigator Home
    Episode 24 of the Class Re-Action Podcast is finally available
    4 weeks ago
  • Guideposts | Punitive Damages Blog | Law Lawyers | Mayer Brown LLP
    If This Isn’t A Product Of Passion Or Prejudice, What Is?
    1 month ago
  • An Appeal to Reason
    Time to Speak Out
    4 months ago
  • The UCL Practitioner
    Interplay between UCL and tax code: McClain v. Sav-On Drugs and Loeffler v. Target Corp.
    7 months ago
  • Cal Biz Lit
    AND NOW, HERE’S CBL’S REPORT ON 2018 CONSENT JUDGMENT SETTLEMENTS
    9 months ago

Newstex script


































May 13, 2009

"Souter favored limits on punitive damages"

Fortune.com has an article online today entitled "What will Souter's retirement mean for business? Justice favored limits on punitive damages."

I posted a few thoughts on this topic earlier this month, in response to a post on the Volokh Conspiracy.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Posted by Curt Cutting at 11:49 AM

Labels: U.S. Supreme Court

Newer Post Older Post Home








GoDaddy Certification