skip to main | skip to sidebar
California Punitive Damages
News and commentary on punitive damages litigation in California and nationwide.
This blog is maintained by attorneys at Horvitz & Levy LLP, the nation's largest law firm devoted exclusively to appellate litigation.
  • Disclaimer

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe via email
Follow us on Twitter

Statutes

  • California Civil Code, sections 3294-3296

Archive

Labels

  • Arbitration (6)
  • California Court of Appeal (296)
  • California Supreme Court (75)
  • Celebrities (19)
  • Choice of Law (5)
  • Class Actions (28)
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence (25)
  • Default Judgments (11)
  • Extraterritoriality (8)
  • Exxon Valdez (61)
  • Financial Condition Evidence (84)
  • Foreign Courts (29)
  • Gulf Oil Spill (4)
  • Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
  • Jury Instructions (19)
  • Labor and Employment (16)
  • Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
  • Law Review Articles (67)
  • Legislation (78)
  • Managing Agents (21)
  • Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
  • Pleading (6)
  • Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
  • Statistics (8)
  • Statutory Penalties (3)
  • Taxation (23)
  • Top 10 Lists (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (48)
  • U.S. Supreme Court (153)

Recommended Blogs

  • The Volokh Conspiracy
    [Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
    26 minutes ago
  • How Appealing
    “Enemies, a Love Story: Inside the 36-year Biden and McConnell Relationship; The two 78-year-old deal-makers have been parties to the collapse of Capitol culture; Now they’ll need to make Washington work again.”
    1 hour ago
  • The Legal Pulse
    Ninth Circuit Protects Federal Regulatory Regime that Promotes the Dissemination of Nutrition Information
    2 hours ago
  • Lowering the Bar
    Oklahoma Legislator Proposes Big Foot Hunting Season
    3 hours ago
  • SCOTUSblog
    Friday round-up
    3 hours ago
  • Southern California Appellate News
    It's gotta be over $5K...
    13 hours ago
  • At the Lectern
    Review granted in mistake-of-fact instructional error case; one vote short for hearing attorney-client privilege issue in gender-identity discrimination matter
    16 hours ago
  • Election Law Blog
    “Referring Former President Trump’s Suspension From Facebook to the Oversight Board”
    23 hours ago
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES
    Discovery, Sanctions: $6,954.95 Deposition Discovery Sanctions Award Was Appealable Even Though It Was Payable To Two Different Recipients, While $1,750 Sanctions Award Was Not Appealable
    1 day ago
  • TortsProf Blog
    Two by Parks & Grindell on Hazing
    1 day ago
  • Cal Biz Lit
    OEHHA PROPOSES TO DRAMATICALLY CHANGE THE RULES FOR PROPOSITION 65 SHORT FORM WARNINGS
    2 days ago
  • The Complex Litigator Home
    The answer is "yes," Dynamex does apply retroactively on the interpretation of "suffer or permit to work"
    1 week ago
  • Guideposts | Punitive Damages Blog | Law Lawyers | Mayer Brown LLP
    A Tribute To Andy Frey Upon His Retirement From Mayer Brown
    2 weeks ago
  • The UCL Practitioner
    Interesting panels during this year's virtual Golden State Institute, October 27-29, 2020
    3 months ago
  • An Appeal to Reason
    What Ruth Bader Ginsburg means to me
    4 months ago
  • Overlawyered
    A good run: Overlawyered, 1999-2020
    7 months ago

Newstex script


































December 3, 2008

Round-up on Williams III Argument

ABC News: Third and Long for Philip Morris?

SCOTUSblog: New Briefing on Tobacco Case? Maybe

Associated Press: Smoker's Widow Seeks $79.5 Million Award at Supreme Court

Christian Science Monitor: U.S. Supreme Court Takes Up Tobacco Case for Third Time

McClatchy: Justices' Irritation With Lower Court Could Save Tobacco Giant Millions

New York Times: Justices Look Anew at Case in Which Oregon Court has Twice Rebuffed Them

WSJ Law Blog: In Big Punitives Case, Has court Painted Itself Into a Corner?

Business Insurance: High Court to Rule Again In Oregon Punitives Case

We'll post some of our own thoughts about the argument after we've had time to digest the transcript.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Posted by Curt Cutting at 3:39 PM

Labels: Philip Morris v. Williams, U.S. Supreme Court

Newer Post Older Post Home








GoDaddy Certification