The Associated Press has an article today entitled "Damages Limit A Concern in the Wake of Train Crash" (via the LA Daily News). The article includes quotes from Brian Panish, a plaintiff's attorney who is representing two of the crash victims in last week's head-on collision between a Metrolink commuter train and a Union Pacific freight train in Los Angeles. (The article mistakenly refers to Panish as a defense attorney.) Panish intends to challenge the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997, which places a $200 million limit on damages payouts in rail accident cases. The limit includes compensatory and punitive damages.
Of course, that's assuming that punitive damages would even be available in such a case. In litigation over the 2002 crash between a Metrolink commuter train and a Burlington Northern freight train in Placentia, the superior court ruled the plaintiffs' punitive damages claim was preempted by federal law. (Full disclosure: Horvitz & Levy consulted on the motion for summary adjudication that knocked out the punitive damages claim in the Placentia litigation. Panish's firm represented some of the plaintiffs.)
Bogle on Private Law Theory and the Past
1 hour ago
