Yesterday we filed our answer, on behalf of Unocal, to the plaintiffs' petition for review in Holdgrafer v. Unocal. This is another case we've been blogging about for a while, in which the Court of Appeal reversed a $5 million punitive damages award against Unocal because the award was tainted by improperly admitted evidence.
Archive
Labels
- Arbitration (6)
- California Court of Appeal (272)
- California Supreme Court (67)
- Celebrities (19)
- Choice of Law (5)
- Class Actions (28)
- Clear and Convincing Evidence (20)
- Default Judgments (10)
- Extraterritoriality (8)
- Exxon Valdez (61)
- Financial Condition Evidence (78)
- Foreign Courts (29)
- Gulf Oil Spill (4)
- Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
- Jury Instructions (19)
- Labor and Employment (16)
- Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
- Law Review Articles (67)
- Legislation (75)
- Managing Agents (21)
- Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
- Pleading (6)
- Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
- Statistics (8)
- Statutory Penalties (3)
- Taxation (23)
- Top 10 Lists (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (43)
- U.S. Supreme Court (149)
Recommended Blogs
-
-
SCOTUS Map: March and April 20192 hours ago
-
-
Climate change and energy roundup6 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
2d DCA pro tem update21 hours ago
-
-
Assorted Stupidity #1234 days ago
-
-
-
-
-
Newstex script
GoDaddy Certification