Yesterday we filed our answer, on behalf of Unocal, to the plaintiffs' petition for review in Holdgrafer v. Unocal. This is another case we've been blogging about for a while, in which the Court of Appeal reversed a $5 million punitive damages award against Unocal because the award was tainted by improperly admitted evidence.
May 1, 2008
Unocal Responds to Plaintiffs' Petition for Review in Holdgrafer v. Unocal
Posted by
Curt Cutting
at
2:49 PM
Labels: California Supreme Court