We previously mentioned the pending cert. petition in Chemtall v. Stern, which presents an issue regarding the constitutionality of a reverse bifurcation procedure in which punitive damages issues are decided before liability and compensatory damages. Apparently, the plaintiffs are not too concerned about Carter Philips' petition, as they waived their right to file a response. (See the Supreme Court's online docket for this case.) They aren't really taking much of a risk, because the Supreme Court would call for an opposition before deciding to grant certiorari.
Archive
Labels
- Arbitration (6)
- California Court of Appeal (277)
- California Supreme Court (68)
- Celebrities (19)
- Choice of Law (5)
- Class Actions (28)
- Clear and Convincing Evidence (23)
- Default Judgments (11)
- Extraterritoriality (8)
- Exxon Valdez (61)
- Financial Condition Evidence (81)
- Foreign Courts (29)
- Gulf Oil Spill (4)
- Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
- Jury Instructions (19)
- Labor and Employment (16)
- Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
- Law Review Articles (67)
- Legislation (76)
- Managing Agents (21)
- Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
- Pleading (6)
- Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
- Statistics (8)
- Statutory Penalties (3)
- Taxation (23)
- Top 10 Lists (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (45)
- U.S. Supreme Court (151)
Recommended Blogs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Time to Speak Out3 months ago
-
-
Newstex script
GoDaddy Certification