The CA Supreme Court recently granted itself an extra 30 days to rule on a petition for review raising the question whether a class action can properly be certified where punitive damages are sought. Here's the docket in case you want to follow progress in the matter. Oh, and by the way, it's our petition for review.
Archive
Labels
- Arbitration (6)
- California Court of Appeal (302)
- California Supreme Court (75)
- Celebrities (19)
- Choice of Law (5)
- Class Actions (28)
- Clear and Convincing Evidence (25)
- Default Judgments (11)
- Extraterritoriality (8)
- Exxon Valdez (61)
- Financial Condition Evidence (84)
- Foreign Courts (29)
- Gulf Oil Spill (4)
- Hurricane Katrina Litigation (4)
- Jury Instructions (19)
- Labor and Employment (16)
- Largest Punitive Damages Awards to Survive Appeal (10)
- Law Review Articles (67)
- Legislation (78)
- Managing Agents (23)
- Philip Morris v. Williams (40)
- Pleading (6)
- Split-Recovery Statutes (11)
- Statistics (8)
- Statutory Penalties (3)
- Taxation (23)
- Top 10 Lists (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 11th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit (3)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 3d Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 4th Circuit (3)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 5th Circuit (9)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 6th Circuit (1)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 7th Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 8th Circuit (2)
- U.S. Court of Appeals: 9th Circuit (49)
- U.S. Supreme Court (155)
Recommended Blogs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Penney on Chilling Effects4 days ago
-
Assorted Stupidity #1454 days ago
-
-
-
-
What Ruth Bader Ginsburg means to me8 months ago
-
A good run: Overlawyered, 1999-20201 year ago
Newstex script
GoDaddy Certification